Introduction
Footways carry a
lighter general loading than carriageways in comparable locations.
However appreciable strength of structure and surface properties are
required to withstand the stresses generated by pedestrian traffic and
the cross over of vehicles to access properties or by parked vehicles.
Walkways in urban
areas must have adequate stability to high point loading and severe
surface stresses. In rural situations an important requirement is for a
sound base proofed against the ingress of moisture. However, whatever
the situation the quality of construction and level of maintenance
significantly affect the long term durability and serviceable life of a
footway. Bitumen emulsions fulfil a vital role in all aspects of
footway construction and maintenance from the initial sealing of freshly
cut formations to the surface treatment of heavily stressed areas.
General guidance on
the use of bitumen emulsions for pavement construction and maintenance
is contained in BS 434 Pt2.
Footway Maintenance
Where the shape is
satisfactory but the surface is slippery or in danger of imminent
break-up, surface dressing or slurry surfacing may be employed as a
remedial treatment.
1.
Surface Dressing
Emulsions classes C69 B3 or C69 BF3 (K1-70), or proprietary footway
surface dressing binders are recommended for this surface treatment to
seal and/or restore surface texture. It is also proven to be a very
effective method of restoring uniformity to an otherwise heavily patched
surface. Road Note 39 contains a specific design section on surface
dressing for footways and cycleways and should be referred to for
specific design criteria. As a general rule, however, emulsion
application rates vary between 1.3 l/m² and 1.8 l/m² when 2.8/6.3 or
2/4mm chippings are used.
Over the
years, increasing amounts of footway surface dressing has occurred on
urban sites, where resistance to bleeding in hot weather and resistance
to chippings turning due to surface stresses from traffic cross over
points and power steering is imperative. For this reason polymer
modified (proprietary) emulsion binders are extensively used in these
areas.
The success
of these dressings depends not only on the specific design criteria
employed, but on control of application. Of particular importance is the
application equipment, which must be able to accurately and evenly
dispense the binder at the design rate. The need to keep stray binder
off fences, walls, kerbstones etc, by use of appropriate masking or
specialised application techniques is very importance to the success of
the job.
2. Slurry
Surfacing
Slurry surfacing is composed of fine aggregate and bitumen emulsion
in slurry form, which seals cracks, arrests fretting, fills minor
depressions and voids and provides a more even and slip-resistant
wearing surface. Both slow setting and rapid setting slurries are
available to satisfy varying site conditions. These materials are
generally unmodified bitumen emulsions for footways such as K3-60 (C59
B7 or C59 BF7), although proprietary polymer modified emulsions are
sometimes used.
It should always be remembered that the finished slurry is a specific
design mix and individual binders and aggregates will require a specific
design. Conformity to the specific design mix is imperative for the
success of this process.
Site mixtures are generally batch produced in concrete mixers and the
slurries hand applied. In keeping with the mix design, consistency of
the mix batch to batch is important for consistency of both appearance
and performance of the finished footway surfacing.
Footway
Construction
There are a number of
ways in which footways may be constructed but whatever method is used it
is advisable to follow these basic rules:
1. Base
Treatment
The freshly cut or placed formation and/or freshly laid sub-base
should be sealed, with the object of retaining the strength by
preserving moisture equilibrium. Bitumen emulsions of class C40B4 or
C40BF4 (K1-40), C59B3 or C59BF3 (K1-60), A1-40, A1-55 and A1-60 are used
in cold application. Rates of application 0.9 - 1.4 l/m² are
recommended (note: actual application rate will depend upon local site
conditions as well as the binder content of the material being
sprayed).
2. Tack Coat
Where coated macadams or asphalts are employed, a tack coat of
emulsion should be used between layers to provide an adhesive and dust
free surface. The emulsion used for this work should be either Class
C40B4 or C40BF4 (K1-40), C59B3 or C59BF3 (K1-60) or the equivalent
anionic grades, at a rate of application between 0.4 l/m² and 0.6
l/m².
3. Grouting
On sites subject to low stress it may be economical to prepare, in
situ, a combined base/wearing course by means of application of emulsion
into the interstices of the aggregate, after the latter has been spread
on the foundation and compacted, i.e. grouting. For a full grouting, the
emulsion is used to fully coat the aggregate throughout the depth of the
material The emulsion employed should be selected from classes C59B3 or
C59BF3 (K1-60), A1-55, A1-60 or, the former being preferred in
situations where the stone layer is open or wet. C69B3 or C69BF3
(K1-70) may be employed by agreement between purchaser and supplier.
For footway construction, the semi-grout principle is more generally
adopted, whereby the emulsion is only intended to penetrate the upper
part of the construction, thus providing a limited depth of cohesion and
waterproofing. . Figures applicable to full and semi-grout are given in
Table 1.
(i)
Rate
of Application
For a full grout, the quantity of emulsion should be sufficient to
penetrate to the full depth of the course; it is advantageous to apply
the emulsion in two stages. For semi-grouted work, the quantity of
emulsion used should be sufficient to coat the aggregate to the full
depth of the layer above the slurried or waterbound layer.
Table
1- TYPICAL RATES OF APPLICATION FOR GROUTING
|
Thickness
of Course |
Nominal
Size
of
Aggregate |
Full Grout |
Semi-grout |
|
mm |
|
l/m² |
l/m² |
|
50 |
40 mm down |
5.5 - 7.0 |
3.0 - 5.5 |
|
65 |
50 mm down |
7.0 - 9.5 |
4.0 - 7.0 |
|
75 |
50 mm down |
9.5 - 11.0 |
5.5 - 8.0 |
(ii) Procedure
After initial compaction and subsequent application of emulsion, clean
2.8/6.3 mm or 6.3/10 mm chippings should be spread uniformly over the
surface in sufficient quantity to fill up existing surface interstices,
but not in excess of this. The surface should then be rolled again.
After an
agreed interval, a surface dressing should be applied using 2.8/6.3 mm
chippings and emulsion selected from class, C69B3 or C69BF3 (K1-70), or
a proprietary footway surface dressing emulsion (e.g.C69 BP3). The
purpose of this dressing is to seal the surface and provide rugosity.
4.
Surface Dressing
In the case of surface sealing on a waterbound construction, it may be
necessary to apply a double surface dressing, wherein two binder and
chipping applications are carried out in quick succession. Emulsion
classes C69B3 or C69BF3 (K1-70) or proprietary footway surface dressing
emulsions are recommended and approximate rates of application are as
follows:
Single
Dressing 1.6 - 1.9 l/m² using 2.8/6.3 mm
chippings
Double
Dressing 1st application: 0.9 - 1.4 l/m²
using 2.8/6.3
mm chippings 2nd application: 0.9 - 1.4 l/m²
More information on
design criteria and application rates can be found in Road Note 39
available from TRL
Footway
Reconstruction
Retread
Where a footway has reached a state of disintegration or needs
reshaping, it is possible to employ emulsions as a means of in-situ
recycling. The retread process involves scarifying the existing
surface, normally to a depth of 75 mm, importing some fresh aggregate if
required to adjust grading, and treating with two successive
applications of emulsion. Application rates of emulsion will depend on
the nature of the scarified material and must be subject to agreement
between Supplier and Contractor. Special attention must be given to the
final profile achieved as this is critical to the end user and is often
complicated by the smaller nature of the plant employed. Reference
should also be made to REAL Technical Data Sheet Number 10.
Revised by the Technical Committee Jan 2007